<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Questions than Charges for TJ Waconia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.behindthemortgage.com/2008/04/more-questions-than-charges-for-tj-waconia.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.behindthemortgage.com/2008/04/more-questions-than-charges-for-tj-waconia.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=more-questions-than-charges-for-tj-waconia</link>
	<description>Alex Stenback &#124; Twin Cities Blog on Mortgages, Rates, and Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:38:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Northside</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthemortgage.com/2008/04/more-questions-than-charges-for-tj-waconia.html/comment-page-1#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Northside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.multiplycommunications.com/btm/?p=731#comment-901</guid>
		<description>Say more! Spill more details. The city didn&#039;t get control of ONE HOUSE? Or did they win some right to manage, some right to redeem, ANYTHING? 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say more! Spill more details. The city didn&#8217;t get control of ONE HOUSE? Or did they win some right to manage, some right to redeem, ANYTHING?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthemortgage.com/2008/04/more-questions-than-charges-for-tj-waconia.html/comment-page-1#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.multiplycommunications.com/btm/?p=731#comment-900</guid>
		<description>You are right.  They are all showing up as REO&#039;s.  I am writing up offers on 2 of them right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right.  They are all showing up as REO&#8217;s.  I am writing up offers on 2 of them right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Northside</title>
		<link>http://www.behindthemortgage.com/2008/04/more-questions-than-charges-for-tj-waconia.html/comment-page-1#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Northside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.multiplycommunications.com/btm/?p=731#comment-899</guid>
		<description>There have been huge developments in the TJ Waconia case in the past few days. I&#039;m using this comment area even though the story has continued to develop, because some public information needs SERIOUS CLARIFICATION based on what I&#039;m hearing behind the scenes. 

Look, WORD ON THE STREET is the information in the most recent Star Tribune article is grossly inaccurate. The properties are all REO bank-owned, according to what I&#039;m hearing. These 140 or so properties DID NOT just fall into the hands of the city, and it may be politicians are trying to make hay from this, but I&#039;m hearing the info is NOT ACCURATE and Minneapolis DID NOT just get its hands on 140 houses.

I can&#039;t confirm this info, but I&#039;m hearing it in a serious way. Does anybody else know? What is the true situation, here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been huge developments in the TJ Waconia case in the past few days. I&#8217;m using this comment area even though the story has continued to develop, because some public information needs SERIOUS CLARIFICATION based on what I&#8217;m hearing behind the scenes. </p>
<p>Look, WORD ON THE STREET is the information in the most recent Star Tribune article is grossly inaccurate. The properties are all REO bank-owned, according to what I&#8217;m hearing. These 140 or so properties DID NOT just fall into the hands of the city, and it may be politicians are trying to make hay from this, but I&#8217;m hearing the info is NOT ACCURATE and Minneapolis DID NOT just get its hands on 140 houses.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t confirm this info, but I&#8217;m hearing it in a serious way. Does anybody else know? What is the true situation, here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

